Whose Media? Why It Matters

Democratic governments claim to represent the will of the people. However, most voters are low-agency, meaning they get most of their information from easily-accessible sources such as television news and social media. These sources not only shape voter perception of candidates and policies, but over time actually mold people's morality. Therefore, in democracies, news and entertainment media arguably have more influence on election outcomes than anyone or anything else, barring perhaps churches in the case of older people.

As such, one must know the media controllers and their motivations in order to understand politics in ostensibly democratic countries such as the USA.

Why Highlight Jews?

Simply put, Israel is the Jewish nation-state. Understandably, according to the American Jewish Committee, for 80% of American Jews, caring about Israel is "an important or essential part of what being Jewish means." This would presumably include the many Jews in news & entertainment media, who regularly slander Israel's enemies.

Many media accusations against Israeli regional rivals like Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi & Bashar al-Assad have turned out to be exaggerations if not outright fabrications. Allow me to briefly summarise:

Two months after Saddam invaded Kuwait in the 1990 Gulf War, a girl named Nayirah testified before Congress that Iraqi troops had murdered Kuwaiti babies taken straight from hospital incubators. It later came out that this girl was a daughter of Kuwait's American ambassador, and the whole thing was fabricated in coordination with the American PR firm Hill & Knowlton.

In September of 2002, long-serving Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu insisted before Congress that there was "no question whatsoever" that Saddam was developing an arsenal of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons that would eventually end up in the hands of Muslim terrorists. George Bush reiterated this allegation in his State of the Union address before the 2003 invasion of Iraq, based on documents later revealed as nothing more than crude (likely Israeli) forgeries.

In order to justify our bombing Libya back into the Stone Age, the media baselessly alleged that Gaddafi had been sending soldiers on Viagra-fueled rape sprees. In reality, the Colonel was relatively benevolent, with ambitions to unite all of Francophone Africa under a gold-backed dinar that could have threatened US dollar hegemony.

Finally, Assad was falsely accused of gassing his own people during Syria's civil war. According to whistleblowers from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), these chemical attacks were actually staged by the "moderate" opposition. Obama had already warned that Assad's use of such weapons would be a "red line" for American involvement in the conflict, making these staged attacks very convenient indeed.

From time to time, these atrocity propaganda campaigns have been supplemented by "false flag" attacks on American soil, blamed on Muslims, but likely planned & executed by Zionist agents.

Our excuse for occupying Afghanistan was Osama bin Laden's supposed responsibility for 9/11, even though he denied involvement. One would expect an anti-American terrorist to claim such an impressive attack with pride! The Taliban even offered to turn bin Laden over if America provided evidence of his involvement in the attacks on WTC & the Pentagon, but for some reason, we refused. Additionally, a week after 9/11, someone mailed anthrax stolen from our biowarfare lab Fort Detrick to various public figures. The media insisted that Saddam had provided this anthrax to al Qaeda, the supposed perpetrators of the attacks. Aside from inciting Americans to exploitable rage and fear, this suite of attacks served to engender Western sympathy for Israel's own struggle against Muslim terrorism.

As the Great War on Terror has continued, the West, particularly Europe, has experienced a steady trickle of Muslim stabbings, bombings, etc. Journalist Sibel Edmonds characterized this trend as a modern incarnation of NATO's Cold War "Gladio" program, which staged terrorist attacks in order to discredit both communist & fascist alternatives to liberal democracy. In this case, the goal is not only to maintain public support for Zionist wars against Muslims, but also scare Western Jews into making aliyah to Israel, where they're needed as soldiers & settlers.

In light of all this, Jewish control of American media presents an obvious conflict of interest. A foreign race, with self-admitted dual loyalty to a foreign country, should not be allowed to freely manufacture consent for wars that drain America's coffers & damage its reputation worldwide.